Probing Scalar-Tensor-Induced Gravitational Waves in the nHz Band: $\texttt{NANOGrav}$ and SKA

Author(s)

Iania, William, Ricciardone, Angelo

Abstract

Scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) have recently attracted considerable interest, both as a possible explanation for the nanohertz signal reported by the Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) collaboration and for their connection with primordial black hole (PBH) physics. In addition to SIGWs, scalar-tensor-induced gravitational waves (STGWs) have emerged as a promising cosmological source of the stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB). In this paper, we compute the STGWs generated during a generic matter-dominated (MD) era, as well as during an early matter-dominated (eMD) epoch followed by a sudden transition to the standard radiation-dominated (RD) stage, working in the Poisson gauge. We find that, in a purely MD age, the corresponding energy density rapidly dilutes, whereas in the presence of an eMD phase it remains non-vanishing due to the short duration of the eMD period. We then investigate whether the STGW signal could provide a dominant contribution to the $\texttt{NANOGrav 15-year}$ dataset and we forecast the prospects for its detection with future observations by the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). In particular, we consider STGWs generated during both eMD and RD eras, including their linear-order contributions. Our results show that the GWs induced by scalar-tensor mixing constitute a viable target for future, more sensitive detections of the SGWB.

Figures

Squared kernel before and after the oscillation average in~\cref{eq:temp_I_eMD} as a function of $x=k\eta$.
Caption Squared kernel before and after the oscillation average in~\cref{eq:temp_I_eMD} as a function of $x=k\eta$.
Energy density in~\cref{eq:general_Omega_reg}, normalized by the primordial amplitudes, from an eMD epoch and sudden transition to RD at $\eta_\R=2\times 10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}$, as a function of $k$. The log-normal primordial power spectra have same peak $k_\ast=6.47\times 10^{6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$ (corresponding to a physical frequency $f_\ast \simeq 10^{-8}\,\rm{Hz}$), and various values of $\sigma$, including $\sigma\to0$, i.e., the monochromatic limit.
Caption Energy density in~\cref{eq:general_Omega_reg}, normalized by the primordial amplitudes, from an eMD epoch and sudden transition to RD at $\eta_\R=2\times 10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}$, as a function of $k$. The log-normal primordial power spectra have same peak $k_\ast=6.47\times 10^{6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$ (corresponding to a physical frequency $f_\ast \simeq 10^{-8}\,\rm{Hz}$), and various values of $\sigma$, including $\sigma\to0$, i.e., the monochromatic limit.
Corner plots for STGWs+PGWs generated during an early matter domination that suddenly interrupts transiting to the standard RD epoch. We used lognormal primordial power spectra with same peak and width, and NG15 data, fixing $\eta_{R}=2\times10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$. The plots show the 68\% and 95\% credible regions, whereas the red areas are the subspaces cutted out by the PBH overproduction.
Caption Corner plots for STGWs+PGWs generated during an early matter domination that suddenly interrupts transiting to the standard RD epoch. We used lognormal primordial power spectra with same peak and width, and NG15 data, fixing $\eta_{R}=2\times10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$. The plots show the 68\% and 95\% credible regions, whereas the red areas are the subspaces cutted out by the PBH overproduction.
Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs from an eMD epoch, fixing $\eta_\R=2\times10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$. Right panel: the same Bayesian estimation, adding the contribution of the linear-order PGWs. The shaded regions show the constraints from PBH overproduction. Log-normal primordial power spectra with same shape parameters are used as scalar and tensor seeds.
Caption Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs from an eMD epoch, fixing $\eta_\R=2\times10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$. Right panel: the same Bayesian estimation, adding the contribution of the linear-order PGWs. The shaded regions show the constraints from PBH overproduction. Log-normal primordial power spectra with same shape parameters are used as scalar and tensor seeds.
Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs from an eMD epoch, fixing $\eta_\R=2\times10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$. Right panel: the same Bayesian estimation, adding the contribution of the linear-order PGWs. The shaded regions show the constraints from PBH overproduction. Log-normal primordial power spectra with same shape parameters are used as scalar and tensor seeds.
Caption Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs from an eMD epoch, fixing $\eta_\R=2\times10^{-6}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$. Right panel: the same Bayesian estimation, adding the contribution of the linear-order PGWs. The shaded regions show the constraints from PBH overproduction. Log-normal primordial power spectra with same shape parameters are used as scalar and tensor seeds.
Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs generated during the RD epoch. Right panel: same Bayesian estimation adding the contribution of the PGWs. The shaded regions are forbidden by PBH overproduction. Scalar and tensor seeds are both log-normal power spectra with same peak frequency and width.
Caption Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs generated during the RD epoch. Right panel: same Bayesian estimation adding the contribution of the PGWs. The shaded regions are forbidden by PBH overproduction. Scalar and tensor seeds are both log-normal power spectra with same peak frequency and width.
Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs generated during the RD epoch. Right panel: same Bayesian estimation adding the contribution of the PGWs. The shaded regions are forbidden by PBH overproduction. Scalar and tensor seeds are both log-normal power spectra with same peak frequency and width.
Caption Left panel: Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation obtained from SKA-like configuration with $T_\text{obs}=10.33$ yr and $N_\text{p}=200$, using STGWs generated during the RD epoch. Right panel: same Bayesian estimation adding the contribution of the PGWs. The shaded regions are forbidden by PBH overproduction. Scalar and tensor seeds are both log-normal power spectra with same peak frequency and width.
STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
Caption STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
Caption STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
Caption STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
Caption STGWs generated during early matter domination by log-normal and monochromatic input power spectra, as a function of $f$, for some values of peak frequency and width.
References
  • [1] G. Agazie et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L8, 2023.
  • [2] J. Antoniadis et al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 678, p. A48, 2023.
  • [3] J. Antoniadis et al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 678, p. A50, 2023.
  • [4] J. Antoniadis et al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 685, p. A94, 2024.
  • [5] H. Xu et al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,” Res. Astron. Astrophys., vol. 23, no. 7, p. 075024, 2023.
  • [6] D. J. Reardon et al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L6, 2023.
  • [7] A. Zic et al., “The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., vol. 40, p. e049, 2023.
  • [8] G. Agazie et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Piecewise Power-Law Reconstruction of the Gravitational-Wave Background,” 1 2026.
  • [9] G. Agazie et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Bayesian Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 2, p. L50, 2023.
  • [10] N. Agarwal et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Targeted Searches for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 998, no. 1, p. L11, 2026.
  • [11] A. Afzal et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L11, 2023. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)].
  • [11] A. Afzal et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L11, 2023. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)].
  • [11] A. Afzal et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L11, 2023. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)].
  • [12] C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, “Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 35, no. 16, p. 163001, 2018.
  • [13] L. P. Grishchuk, “Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 409–415, 1975.
  • [14] A. A. Starobinsky, “Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,” JETP Lett., vol. 30, pp. 682–685, 1979.
  • [15] V. A. Rubakov, M. V. Sazhin, and A. V. Veryaskin, “Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 115, pp. 189–192, 1982.
  • [16] R. Fabbri and M. d. Pollock, “The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 125, pp. 445–448, 1983.
  • [17] K. Tomita, “Non-Linear Theory of Gravitational Instability in the Expanding Universe,” Prog. Theor. Phys., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 831–846, 1967.
  • [18] S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, “A Relativistic approach to gravitational instability in the expanding Universe: Second order Lagrangian solutions,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 271, pp. 513–522, 1994.
  • [19] S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, “General relativistic dynamics of irrotational dust: Cosmological implications,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 72, pp. 320–323, 1994.
  • [20] S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and M. Bruni, “Second order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter universe,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 58, p. 043504, 1998.
  • [21] M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and M. S. Turner, “Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 49, pp. 2837–2851, 1994.
  • [22] C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, “Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 77, p. 124015, 2008.
  • [23] M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, “Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 10, p. 103520, 2017. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 089902 (2020)].
  • [23] M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, “Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 10, p. 103520, 2017. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 089902 (2020)].
  • [24] D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, “Gravitational waves from vacuum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, no. 12, p. 123513, 2018.
  • [25] D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, “Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravitational wave production in strong first order phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 2, p. 021302, 2020.
  • [26] A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, T. Kahniashvili, and A. Kosowsky, “Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 8, p. 083512, 2020.
  • [27] C. Caprini et al., “Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,” JCAP, vol. 03, p. 024, 2020.
  • [28] D. Cutting, E. G. Escartin, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, “Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 023531, 2021.
  • [29] C. Han, K.-P. Xie, J. M. Yang, and M. Zhang, “Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 11, p. 115025, 2024.
  • [30] A. Ashoorioon, K. Rezazadeh, and A. Rostami, “NANOGrav signal from the end of inflation and the LIGO mass and heavier primordial black holes,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 835, p. 137542, 2022.
  • [31] P. Athron, A. Fowlie, C.-T. Lu, L. Morris, L. Wu, Y. Wu, and Z. Xu, “Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, no. 22, p. 221001, 2024.
  • [32] Y.-Y. Li, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, M.-Y. Cui, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Q. Yuan, and Y.-Z. Fan, “Primordial magnetic field as a common solution of nanohertz gravitational waves and the Hubble tension,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 4, p. 043538, 2024.
  • [33] T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 31, p. 3052, 1985.
  • [34] M. Sakellariadou, “Gravitational waves emitted from infinite strings,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 42, pp. 354–360, 1990. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 43, 4150 (1991)].
  • [34] M. Sakellariadou, “Gravitational waves emitted from infinite strings,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 42, pp. 354–360, 1990. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 43, 4150 (1991)].
  • [35] T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, pp. 3761–3764, 2000.
  • [36] T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 64, p. 064008, 2001.
  • [37] T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 71, p. 063510, 2005.
  • [38] D. G. Figueroa, M. Hindmarsh, and J. Urrestilla, “Exact Scale-Invariant Background of Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 110, no. 10, p. 101302, 2013.
  • [39] T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, “On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls,” JCAP, vol. 02, p. 031, 2014.
  • [40] J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, “Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 10, p. 104046, 2017.
  • [41] P. Auclair et al., “Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,” JCAP, vol. 04, p. 034, 2020.
  • [42] Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,” JCAP, vol. 07, p. 032, 2020.
  • [43] D. G. Figueroa, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, and J. Urrestilla, “Irreducible background of gravitational waves from a cosmic defect network: update and comparison of numerical techniques,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 10, p. 103516, 2020.
  • [44] C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, “Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings and cosmic archaeology,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 114, 2022.
  • [45] M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, “Cosmic F- and D-strings from pure Yang–Mills theory,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 838, p. 137724, 2023.
  • [46] M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, “Cosmic strings from pure Yang–Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, no. 12, p. 123515, 2022.
  • [47] M. Giovannini, “Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 58, p. 083504, 1998.
  • [48] M. Giovannini, “Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 60, p. 123511, 1999.
  • [49] L. A. Boyle and A. Buonanno, “Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 78, p. 043531, 2008.
  • [50] B. Li, P. R. Shapiro, and T. Rindler-Daller, “Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter and the gravitational wave background from inflation: new cosmological constraints and its detectability by LIGO,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 6, p. 063505, 2017.
  • [51] B. Li and P. R. Shapiro, “Precision cosmology and the stiff-amplified gravitational-wave background from inflation: NANOGrav, Advanced LIGO-Virgo and the Hubble tension,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 024, 2021.
  • [52] D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, “Inconsistency of an inflationary sector coupled only to Einstein gravity,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 050, 2019.
  • [53] D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, “Ability of LIGO and LISA to probe the equation of state of the early Universe,” JCAP, vol. 08, p. 011, 2019.
  • [54] Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion,” 8 2021.
  • [55] R. T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya, and J. Shelton, “Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 116, 2022.
  • [56] Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures,” 11 2021.
  • [57] V. K. Oikonomou, “Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 observation,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 4, p. 043516, 2023.
  • [58] M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, “N-flationary magnetic fields,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 018, 2006.
  • [59] L. Sorbo, “Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,” JCAP, vol. 06, p. 003, 2011.
  • [60] E. Pajer and M. Peloso, “A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 30, p. 214002, 2013.
  • [61] P. Adshead, E. Martinec, and M. Wyman, “Gauge fields and inflation: Chiral gravitational waves, fluctuations, and the Lyth bound,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 021302, 2013.
  • [62] P. Adshead, E. Martinec, and M. Wyman, “Perturbations in Chromo-Natural Inflation,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 087, 2013.
  • [63] A. Maleknejad, “Axion Inflation with an SU(2) Gauge Field: Detectable Chiral Gravity Waves,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 104, 2016.
  • [64] E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and T. Fujita, “Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics,” JCAP, vol. 01, p. 019, 2017.
  • [65] R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, “Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion,” JCAP, vol. 01, p. 041, 2016.
  • [66] R. Z. Ferreira, J. Ganc, J. Noreña, and M. S. Sloth, “On the validity of the perturbative description of axions during inflation,” JCAP, vol. 04, p. 039, 2016. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2016)].
  • [66] R. Z. Ferreira, J. Ganc, J. Noreña, and M. S. Sloth, “On the validity of the perturbative description of axions during inflation,” JCAP, vol. 04, p. 039, 2016. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2016)].
  • [67] M. Peloso, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, “Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures,” JCAP, vol. 09, p. 001, 2016.
  • [68] V. Domcke, M. Pieroni, and P. Binétruy, “Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation,” JCAP, vol. 06, p. 031, 2016.
  • [69] R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, “Axion Gauge Field Inflation and Gravitational Leptogenesis: A Lower Bound on B Modes from the Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 023532, 2018.
  • [70] M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matarrese, “Gravitational waves from inflation,” Riv. Nuovo Cim., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 399–495, 2016.
  • [71] N. Bartolo et al., “Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves,” JCAP, vol. 12, p. 026, 2016.
  • [72] G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, and A. Westphal, “General double monodromy inflation,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, no. 10, p. 103527, 2022.
  • [73] G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, and A. Westphal, “Double Monodromy Inflation: A Gravity Waves Factory for CMB-S4, LiteBIRD and LISA,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, no. 8, p. L081302, 2021.
  • [74] A. Sesana and D. G. Figueroa, “Nanohertz Gravitational Waves,” 12 2025.
  • [75] K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, “The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 75, p. 123518, 2007.
  • [76] D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, “Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 76, p. 084019, 2007.
  • [77] G. Domènech, “Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,” Universe, vol. 7, no. 11, p. 398, 2021.
  • [78] D. G. Figueroa, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and P. Simakachorn, “Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, no. 17, p. 171002, 2024.
  • [79] R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, “Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 102, p. 161101, 2009. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)].
  • [79] R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, “Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 102, p. 161101, 2009. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)].
  • [80] R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, “Gravitational-wave constraints on the abundance of primordial black holes,” Progress of theoretical physics, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 867–886, 2010.
  • [81] B. P. Abbott et al., “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 031040, 2019.
  • [82] R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 11, p. 021053, 2021.
  • [83] R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 041039, 2023.
  • [84] A. G. Abac et al., “GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,” 8 2025.
  • [85] S. Ando, N. Hiroshima, and K. Ishiwata, “Constraining the primordial curvature perturbation using dark matter substructure,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, no. 10, p. 103014, 2022.
  • [86] J. García-Bellido, “Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 840, no. 1, p. 012032, 2017.
  • [87] E. Bagui et al., “Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures,” Living Rev. Rel., vol. 28, no. 1, p. 1, 2025.
  • [88] S. Hawking, “Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 152, p. 75, 1971.
  • [89] B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 168, pp. 399–415, 1974.
  • [90] S. R. Coleman, “Q-balls,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 262, no. 2, p. 263, 1985. [Addendum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)].
  • [90] S. R. Coleman, “Q-balls,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 262, no. 2, p. 263, 1985. [Addendum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)].
  • [91] M. S. Turner, “Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 28, p. 1243, 1983.
  • [92] I. L. Bogolyubsky, “Oscillating Particle-Like Solutions of Nonlinear Klein-Gordon Equation,” JETP Lett., vol. 24, p. 535, 1976.
  • [93] K. D. Lozanov and V. Takhistov, “Enhanced Gravitational Waves from Inflaton Oscillons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 130, no. 18, p. 181002, 2023.
  • [94] X.-B. Sui, J. Liu, and R.-G. Cai, “Enhancement of small-scale induced gravitational waves from solitons and oscillons,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 12, p. 123503, 2025.
  • [95] R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, “Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, no. 25, p. 251802, 2020.
  • [96] R. T. Co and K. Harigaya, “Axiogenesis,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, no. 11, p. 111602, 2020.
  • [97] R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce, “Cosmic perturbations from a rotating field,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 037, 2022.
  • [98] H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, “Gravitational waves from an early matter era,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 79, p. 083511, 2009.
  • [99] K. Kohri and T. Terada, “Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, no. 12, p. 123532, 2018.
  • [100] K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, “Enhancement of Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations due to a Sudden Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, p. 043532, 2019. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 049901 (2023)].
  • [100] K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, “Enhancement of Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations due to a Sudden Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, p. 043532, 2019. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 049901 (2023)].
  • [101] K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, “Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations during a Gradual Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 071, 2019. [Erratum: JCAP 08, E01 (2023)].
  • [101] K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, “Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations during a Gradual Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 071, 2019. [Erratum: JCAP 08, E01 (2023)].
  • [102] K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, T. Terada, and T. T. Yanagida, “Gravitational Wave Production right after a Primordial Black Hole Evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 12, p. 123533, 2020.
  • [103] K. Inomata, K. Kohri, and T. Terada, “The poltergeist mechanism – Enhancement of scalar-induced gravitational waves with early matter-dominated era,” 11 2025.
  • [104] M. Pearce, L. Pearce, G. White, and C. Balazs, “Gravitational wave signals from early matter domination: interpolating between fast and slow transitions,” JCAP, vol. 06, p. 021, 2024.
  • [105] M. Pearce, L. Pearce, G. White, and C. Balázs, “Using gravitational wave signals to disentangle early matter dominated epochs,” JCAP, vol. 11, p. 004, 2025.
  • [106] J.-O. Gong, “Analytic Integral Solutions for Induced Gravitational Waves,” Astrophys. J., vol. 925, no. 1, p. 102, 2022.
  • [107] Z. Chang, X. Zhang, and J.-Z. Zhou, “Gravitational waves from primordial scalar and tensor perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 6, p. 063510, 2023.
  • [108] C. Chen, A. Ota, H.-Y. Zhu, and Y. Zhu, “Missing one-loop contributions in secondary gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 8, p. 083518, 2023.
  • [109] P. Bari, N. Bartolo, G. Domènech, and S. Matarrese, “Gravitational waves induced by scalar-tensor mixing,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 2, p. 023509, 2024.
  • [110] R. Picard and K. A. Malik, “Induced gravitational waves: the effect of first order tensor perturbations,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 010, 2024.
  • [111] Y.-H. Yu and S. Wang, “Primordial gravitational waves assisted by cosmological scalar perturbations,” Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 6, p. 555, 2024.
  • [112] R. Picard and M. W. Davies, “Effects of scalar non-Gaussianity on induced scalar-tensor gravitational waves,” JCAP, vol. 02, p. 037, 2025.
  • [113] R. Picard, L. E. Padilla, K. A. Malik, and D. J. Mulryne, “Suppression of the induced gravitational wave background due to third-order perturbations,” JCAP, vol. 01, p. 056, 2026.
  • [114] D. Wu, J.-Z. Zhou, Y.-T. Kuang, Z.-C. Li, Z. Chang, and Q.-G. Huang, “Can tensor-scalar induced GWs dominate PTA observations?,” JCAP, vol. 03, p. 045, 2025.
  • [115] D. Wu, Z.-C. Li, P.-Y. Wu, F.-Y. Chen, and J.-Z. Zhou, “Probing small-scale primordial power spectra with induced gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 6, p. 063521, 2026.
  • [116] G. Janssen et al., “Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,” PoS, vol. AASKA14, p. 037, 2015.
  • [117] T. J. W. Lazio, “The Square Kilometre Array pulsar timing array,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 30, p. 224011, 2013.
  • [118] A. Mitridate, D. Wright, R. von Eckardstein, T. Schröder, J. Nay, K. Olum, K. Schmitz, and T. Trickle, “PTArcade,” 6 2023.
  • [119] S. Babak, M. Falxa, G. Franciolini, and M. Pieroni, “Forecasting the sensitivity of pulsar timing arrays to gravitational wave backgrounds,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 6, p. 063022, 2024.
  • [120] C. Cecchini, G. Franciolini, and M. Pieroni, “Forecasting constraints on scalar-induced gravitational waves with future pulsar timing array observations,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 12, p. 123536, 2025.
  • [121] F.-Y. Chen, J.-Z. Zhou, D. Wu, Z.-C. Li, and P.-Y. Wu, “Tensor induced gravitational waves,” 7 2025.
  • [122] A. A. Kugarajh, M. Traforetti, A. Maselli, S. Matarrese, and A. Ricciardone, “Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves in Modified Gravity,” 2 2025.
  • [123] G. Perna, C. Testini, A. Ricciardone, and S. Matarrese, “Fully non-Gaussian Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves,” JCAP, vol. 05, p. 086, 2024.
  • [124] J. E. Gammal et al., “Reconstructing primordial curvature perturbations via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA,” JCAP, vol. 05, p. 062, 2025.
  • [125] Y. Watanabe and E. Komatsu, “Improved Calculation of the Primordial Gravitational Wave Spectrum in the Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 73, p. 123515, 2006.
  • [126] G. Domènech, “Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 29, no. 03, p. 2050028, 2020.
  • [127] S. Dodelson and F. Schmidt, Modern Cosmology. Academic Press, 2020.
  • [128] B. Allen and J. D. Romano, “Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 59, p. 102001, 1999.
  • [129] A. A. Kugarajh, “Gauge-dependence of Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 42, no. 12, p. 127001, 2025.
  • [130] J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso, and C. Unal, “Gravitational waves at interferometer scales and primordial black holes in axion inflation,” JCAP, vol. 12, p. 031, 2016.
  • [131] B. Carr, A. J. Iovino, G. Perna, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, “Primordial black holes: constraints, potential evidence and prospects,” 1 2026.
  • [132] W. G. Lamb, S. R. Taylor, and R. van Haasteren, “Rapid refitting techniques for Bayesian spectral characterization of the gravitational wave background using pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 10, p. 103019, 2023.