An early $Z'$ dominance: dark matter, gravitational waves & collider probes

Author(s)

Barman, Basabendu, Das, Nayan, Paul, Partha Kumar, Sahu, Narendra

Abstract

In the minimal anomaly-free gauged B$-$L extension of the Standard Model (SM), we consider a scenario in which the energy density of the new Abelian gauge boson dominates the Universe prior to big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), resulting in an early matter-dominated (EMD) era. Taking one of the three right-handed neutrinos to be a decaying dark matter (DM) candidate, we investigate its production during this EMD phase. We show that the region of parameter space consistent with the relic abundance lies within the projected sensitivity of several gravitational wave (GW) experiments, where the GW signal arises from cosmic strings formed during the spontaneous breaking of the gauged B$-$L symmetry. We further constrain the viable parameter space using bounds from collider experiments, beam dump experiments, BBN, and ultra high energy neutrino observations, demonstrating the complementarity of multi-messenger probes in exploring physics beyond the SM as well as non-standard cosmological histories prior to BBN.

Figures

Feynman diagrams corresponding to DM production from $\zbl$ decay (left) and $\zbl$ mediated scattering of the SM particles in the thermal bath (right).
Caption Feynman diagrams corresponding to DM production from $\zbl$ decay (left) and $\zbl$ mediated scattering of the SM particles in the thermal bath (right).
Left: Evolution of $\zbl$ (blue), radiation (red dashed), DM (green) energy densities along with bath temperature (red solid) and entropy density (black solid), as a function of the scale factor. In all cases we have considered: $\Mzp=10^{4}~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq 9\times10^{-9},\,\Hin=7.5\times10^5~\text{GeV},\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$. Right: Same as top panel, but with $\Mzp=300~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq1.6\times10^{-9},\,\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$.
Caption Left: Evolution of $\zbl$ (blue), radiation (red dashed), DM (green) energy densities along with bath temperature (red solid) and entropy density (black solid), as a function of the scale factor. In all cases we have considered: $\Mzp=10^{4}~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq 9\times10^{-9},\,\Hin=7.5\times10^5~\text{GeV},\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$. Right: Same as top panel, but with $\Mzp=300~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq1.6\times10^{-9},\,\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$.
Left: Evolution of $\zbl$ (blue), radiation (red dashed), DM (green) energy densities along with bath temperature (red solid) and entropy density (black solid), as a function of the scale factor. In all cases we have considered: $\Mzp=10^{4}~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq 9\times10^{-9},\,\Hin=7.5\times10^5~\text{GeV},\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$. Right: Same as top panel, but with $\Mzp=300~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq1.6\times10^{-9},\,\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$.
Caption Left: Evolution of $\zbl$ (blue), radiation (red dashed), DM (green) energy densities along with bath temperature (red solid) and entropy density (black solid), as a function of the scale factor. In all cases we have considered: $\Mzp=10^{4}~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq 9\times10^{-9},\,\Hin=7.5\times10^5~\text{GeV},\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$. Right: Same as top panel, but with $\Mzp=300~{\rm GeV},\,\gbl\simeq1.6\times10^{-9},\,\mdm=100\,\text{GeV}$.
Spectrum of GW from CS for the BPs listed in Table~\ref{tab:BP}. The blue, red, magenta, cyan and gray lines represent the amplitude corresponding to BP0 ($G\mu \sim 1.5\times10^{-19})$, BP3 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-15} $), BP4 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-13} $), BP5 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-11} $), and BP6 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-9} $), respectively. The dashed lines distinguish the amplitude of the GW between the standard radiation domination and EMD. The color shaded regions denote current and future sensitivities of various experiments: LIGO~\cite{LIGOScientific:2014pky}, ET~\cite{Punturo_2010}, CE~\cite{LIGOScientific:2016wof}, DECIGO~\cite{Yagi:2011wg}, ultimate DECIGO ~\cite{Seto:2001qf}, BBO~\cite{Seto:2001qf}, LISA~\cite{LISACosmologyWorkingGroup:2022kbp}, $\mu$ARES~\cite{Sesana:2019vho}, THEIA~\cite{Garcia-Bellido:2021zgu} and SKA~\cite{Weltman:2018zrl}.
Caption Spectrum of GW from CS for the BPs listed in Table~\ref{tab:BP}. The blue, red, magenta, cyan and gray lines represent the amplitude corresponding to BP0 ($G\mu \sim 1.5\times10^{-19})$, BP3 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-15} $), BP4 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-13} $), BP5 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-11} $), and BP6 ($G\mu \sim 2\times10^{-9} $), respectively. The dashed lines distinguish the amplitude of the GW between the standard radiation domination and EMD. The color shaded regions denote current and future sensitivities of various experiments: LIGO~\cite{LIGOScientific:2014pky}, ET~\cite{Punturo_2010}, CE~\cite{LIGOScientific:2016wof}, DECIGO~\cite{Yagi:2011wg}, ultimate DECIGO ~\cite{Seto:2001qf}, BBO~\cite{Seto:2001qf}, LISA~\cite{LISACosmologyWorkingGroup:2022kbp}, $\mu$ARES~\cite{Sesana:2019vho}, THEIA~\cite{Garcia-Bellido:2021zgu} and SKA~\cite{Weltman:2018zrl}.
{\it Summary of parameter space:} contours of right DM abundance for $\mdm=100$ GeV, where we have fixed two values of the initial Hubble parameter: $\Hin=7.5\times10^5$ GeV (red solid line) and $\Hin=7.5$ GeV (green solid line). Along the blue shaded contour, the observed DM abundance is satisfied for production during RD. The diagonal gray contours represent SNR value $\mathcal{S}=10$, appearing from different GW experiments. All shaded regions are excluded from different experimental observations, as well as theoretical bounds (see text for details). BP1, BP2, BP3 and BP4, from Table \ref{tab:BP} are shown with black star points.
Caption {\it Summary of parameter space:} contours of right DM abundance for $\mdm=100$ GeV, where we have fixed two values of the initial Hubble parameter: $\Hin=7.5\times10^5$ GeV (red solid line) and $\Hin=7.5$ GeV (green solid line). Along the blue shaded contour, the observed DM abundance is satisfied for production during RD. The diagonal gray contours represent SNR value $\mathcal{S}=10$, appearing from different GW experiments. All shaded regions are excluded from different experimental observations, as well as theoretical bounds (see text for details). BP1, BP2, BP3 and BP4, from Table \ref{tab:BP} are shown with black star points.
Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:relicparam}, but for $\mdm=1$ GeV.
Caption Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:relicparam}, but for $\mdm=1$ GeV.
Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:relicparam}, but for $\mdm=4$ PeV to explain the IceCube neutrino events with a decaying DM.
Caption Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:relicparam}, but for $\mdm=4$ PeV to explain the IceCube neutrino events with a decaying DM.
References
  • [1] A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls, Phys. Rept. 121 (1985) 263.
  • [2] A. Vilenkin and E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects, Cambridge University Press (7, 2000).
  • [3] A. Davidson, B=L as the fourth color within an SU(2)L × U(1)R × U(1) model, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 776.
  • [4] R.N. Mohapatra and R.E. Marshak, Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 1316.
  • [5] W. Buchmuller, C. Greub and P. Minkowski, Neutrino masses, neutral vector bosons and the scale of B-L breaking, Phys. Lett. B 267 (1991) 395.
  • [6] N. Sahu and U.A. Yajnik, Dark matter and leptogenesis in gauged B - L symmetric models embedding nu MSM, Phys. Lett. B 635 (2006) 11 [hep-ph/0509285].
  • [7] N. Sahu, P. Bhattacharjee and U.A. Yajnik, B - L cosmic strings and baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083534 [hep-ph/0406054].
  • [8] J.C. Montero and V. Pleitez, Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 64 [0706.0473].
  • [9] P. Langacker, The Physics of Heavy Z′ Gauge Bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199 [0801.1345].
  • [10] E. Ma and R. Srivastava, Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses with B − L gauge symmetry and S3 flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 741 (2015) 217 [1411.5042].
  • [11] B.L. Sánchez-Vega and E.R. Schmitz, Fermionic dark matter and neutrino masses in a B-L model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 053007 [1505.03595].
  • [12] N. Okada and S. Okada, Z′ BL portal dark matter and LHC Run-2 results, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 075003 [1601.07526].
  • [13] N. Okada and S. Okada, Z′ -portal right-handed neutrino dark matter in the minimal U(1)X extended Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 035025 [1611.02672].
  • [14] A. Biswas, D. Borah and D. Nanda, Type III seesaw for neutrino masses in U(1)B=L model with multi-component dark matter, JHEP 12 (2019) 109 [1908.04308].
  • [15] A. Das, S. Goswami, K.N. Vishnudath and T. Nomura, Constraining a general U(1)′ inverse seesaw model from vacuum stability, dark matter and collider, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 055026 [1905.00201].
  • [16] P. Ghosh, S. Mahapatra, N. Narendra and N. Sahu, TeV scale modified type-II seesaw mechanism and dark matter in a gauged U(1)B-L symmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 015001 [2107.11951].
  • [17] S. Mahapatra, P.K. Paul, N. Sahu and P. Shukla, Verifiable type-III seesaw and dark matter in a gauged U(1)B−L symmetric model, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (2026) 67 [2504.00109].
  • [18] E. Ma, P.K. Paul and N. Sahu, Naturally small Dirac neutrino mass and B-L dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 114 (2026) 055047 [2601.05926].
  • [19] A. Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings, Phys. Lett. B 107 (1981) 47.
  • [20] N. Turok, Grand Unified Strings and Galaxy Formation, Nucl. Phys. B 242 (1984) 520.
  • [21] R.R. Caldwell, R.A. Battye and E.P.S. Shellard, Relic gravitational waves from cosmic strings: Updated constraints and opportunities for detection, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 7146 [astro-ph/9607130].
  • [22] Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D.E. Morrissey and J.D. Wells, Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings, JHEP 01 (2019) 081 [1808.08968].
  • [23] K. Schmitz and T. Schroeder, Gravitational waves from cosmic strings for pedestrians, JCAP 01 (2026) 025 [2412.20907].
  • [24] S. Datta, A. Ghosal and R. Samanta, Baryogenesis from ultralight primordial black holes and strong gravitational waves from cosmic strings, JCAP 08 (2021) 021 [2012.14981].
  • [25] Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D.E. Morrissey and J.D. Wells, Cosmic Archaeology with Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123505 [1711.03104].
  • [26] Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings, JCAP 07 (2020) 032 [1912.02569].
  • [27] A. Das, N. Okada and N. Papapietro, Electroweak vacuum stability in classically conformal B-L extension of the Standard Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 122 [1509.01466].
  • [28] P.K. Paul, N. Sahu and P. Shukla, Thermal leptogenesis, dark matter, and gravitational waves from an extended canonical seesaw scenario, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) 015032 [2409.08828].
  • [29] W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari and M. Plumacher, Leptogenesis for pedestrians, Annals Phys. 315 (2005) 305 [hep-ph/0401240].
  • [30] L.H. Ford, INFLATION DRIVEN BY A VECTOR FIELD, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 967.
  • [31] A. Golovnev, V. Mukhanov and V. Vanchurin, Vector Inflation, JCAP 06 (2008) 009 [0802.2068].
  • [32] S. Cléry, P. Anastasopoulos and Y. Mambrini, Reheating and leptogenesis after vector inflation, JCAP 12 (2024) 035 [2307.06011].
  • [33] S. Sarkar, Big bang nucleosynthesis and physics beyond the standard model, Rept. Prog. Phys. 59 (1996) 1493 [hep-ph/9602260].
  • [34] M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0002127].
  • [35] S. Hannestad, What is the lowest possible reheating temperature?, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043506 [astro-ph/0403291].
  • [36] F. De Bernardis, L. Pagano and A. Melchiorri, New constraints on the reheating temperature of the universe after WMAP-5, Astropart. Phys. 30 (2008) 192.
  • [37] P. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti, Bounds on very low reheating scenarios after Planck, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123534 [1511.00672].
  • [38] T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R.S.L. Hansen, T. Tram and S. Hannestad, MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles, JCAP 12 (2019) 012 [1908.10189].
  • [39] J. McDonald, Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249].
  • [40] L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080 [0911.1120].
  • [41] N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen, The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32 (2017) 1730023 [1706.07442].
  • [42] Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01.
  • [43] Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209].
  • [44] X. Martin and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational wave background from hybrid topological defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2879 [astro-ph/9606022].
  • [45] P. Auclair et al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA, JCAP 04 (2020) 034 [1909.00819].
  • [46] T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3052.
  • [47] J.J. Blanco-Pillado, K.D. Olum and B. Shlaer, The number of cosmic string loops, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 023512 [1309.6637].
  • [48] J.J. Blanco-Pillado and K.D. Olum, Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 104046 [1709.02693].
  • [49] T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064008 [gr-qc/0104026].
  • [50] S. Blasi, V. Brdar and K. Schmitz, Fingerprint of low-scale leptogenesis in the primordial gravitational-wave spectrum, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 043321 [2004.02889].
  • [51] Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, BSM with Cosmic Strings: Heavy, up to EeV mass, Unstable Particles, JCAP 07 (2020) 016 [1912.03245].
  • [52] D. Matsunami, L. Pogosian, A. Saurabh and T. Vachaspati, Decay of Cosmic String Loops Due to Particle Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 201301 [1903.05102].
  • [53] P. Auclair, D.A. Steer and T. Vachaspati, Particle emission and gravitational radiation from cosmic strings: observational constraints, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083511 [1911.12066].
  • [54] LIGO Scientific collaboration, Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 074001 [1411.4547].
  • [55] ET Collaboration collaboration, The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical and Quantum Gravity 27 (2010) 194002.
  • [56] LIGO Scientific collaboration, Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 044001 [1607.08697].
  • [57] K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 044011 [1101.3940].
  • [58] N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011].
  • [59] LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA, JCAP 11 (2022) 009 [2201.08782].
  • [60] A. Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron. 51 (2021) 1333 [1908.11391].
  • [61] J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama and G. White, Exploring the early Universe with Gaia and Theia, JCAP 12 (2021) 023 [2104.04778].
  • [62] A. Weltman et al., Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 37 (2020) e002 [1810.02680].
  • [63] Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211].
  • [64] C. Caprini and D.G. Figueroa, Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 163001 [1801.04268].
  • [65] L.A. Boyle and A. Buonanno, Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 043531 [0708.2279].
  • [66] M. Maggiore, Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology, Phys. Rept. 331 (2000) 283 [gr-qc/9909001].
  • [67] B. Allen, The Stochastic gravity wave background: Sources and detection, in Les Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation, pp. 373–417, 4, 1996 [gr-qc/9604033].
  • [68] B. Allen and J.D. Romano, Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 102001 [gr-qc/9710117].
  • [69] A.L. Foguel, G.M. Salla and R.Z. Funchal, (In)Visible signatures of the minimal dark abelian gauge sector, JHEP 12 (2022) 063 [2209.03383].
  • [70] C. Baruch, P. Ilten, Y. Soreq and M. Williams, Axial vectors in DarkCast, JHEP 11 (2022) 124 [2206.08563].
  • [71] BaBar collaboration, Search for a Dark Photon in e+ e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 201801 [1406.2980].
  • [72] BaBar collaboration, Search for Invisible Decays of a Dark Photon Produced in e+ e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 131804 [1702.03327].
  • [73] CMS collaboration, Search for prompt production of a GeV scale resonance decaying to a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrts=13˜\mathrmTeV, .
  • [74] K. Asai, A. Das, J. Li, T. Nomura and O. Seto, Probing for chiral Z’ gauge boson through scattering measurement experiments, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 075026 [2307.09737].
  • [75] CMS collaboration, Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rept. 1115 (2025) 448 [2405.13778].
  • [76] Y. Sakaki and D. Ueda, Searching for new light particles at the international linear collider main beam dump, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 035024.
  • [77] K. Asai, S. Iwamoto, M. Perelstein, Y. Sakaki and D. Ueda, Sub-GeV dark matter search at ILC beam dumps, JHEP 02 (2024) 129 [2301.03816].
  • [78] FASER collaboration, FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095011 [1811.12522].
  • [79] Borexino collaboration, Comprehensive measurement of pp-chain solar neutrinos, Nature 562 (2018) 505 [1808.03265].
  • [80] Borexino collaboration, Constraints on flavor-diagonal non-standard neutrino interactions from borexino phase-ii, JHEP 02 (2020) 038 [1909.02422].
  • [81] CHARM-II collaboration, Measurement of differential cross sections for muon-neutrino electron scattering, Phys. Lett. B 302 (1993) 351.
  • [82] CHARM-II collaboration, Precision measurement of electroweak parameters from the scattering of muon-neutrinos on electrons, Phys. Lett. B 335 (1994) 246.
  • [83] NA64 collaboration, Dark matter search in missing energy events with na64, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 121801 [1906.00176].
  • [84] NA64 collaboration, Search for vector mediator of dark matter production in invisible decay mode, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 072002 [1710.00971].
  • [85] J.L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Axionlike particles at FASER: The LHC as a photon beam dump, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055021 [1806.02348].
  • [86] L.A. Anchordoqui et al., The forward physics facility: Sites, experiments, and physics potential, Phys. Rept. 968 (2022) 1 [2203.08088].
  • [87] J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish, Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015].
  • [88] V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039].
  • [89] H. Kudoh, A. Taruya, T. Hiramatsu and Y. Himemoto, Detecting a gravitational-wave background with next-generation space interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064006 [gr-qc/0511145].
  • [90] LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786.
  • [91] D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 035 [1907.04833].
  • [92] S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013 [1012.0908].
  • [93] M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002.
  • [94] B. Sathyaprakash et al., Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 124013 [1206.0331].
  • [95] M. Maggiore et al., Science Case for the Einstein Telescope, JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622].
  • [96] NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11 [2306.16219].
  • [97] T. Charnock, A. Avgoustidis, E.J. Copeland and A. Moss, CMB constraints on cosmic strings and superstrings, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 123503 [1603.01275].
  • [98] J. Lizarraga, J. Urrestilla, D. Daverio, M. Hindmarsh and M. Kunz, New CMB constraints for Abelian Higgs cosmic strings, JCAP 10 (2016) 042 [1609.03386].
  • [99] IceCube collaboration, First observation of PeV-energy neutrinos with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 021103 [1304.5356].
  • [100] IceCube collaboration, Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector, Science 342 (2013) 1242856 [1311.5238].
  • [101] IceCube collaboration, Observation of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos in Three Years of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 101101 [1405.5303].
  • [102] IceCube collaboration, A combined maximum-likelihood analysis of the high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux measured with IceCube, Astrophys. J. 809 (2015) 98 [1507.03991].
  • [103] IceCube collaboration, Evidence for Astrophysical Muon Neutrinos from the Northern Sky with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 081102 [1507.04005].
  • [104] S.W. Li, P. Machado, D. Naredo-Tuero and T. Schwemberger, Clash of the Titans: ultra-high energy KM3NeT event versus IceCube data, 2502.04508.
  • [105] Y. Bai, R. Lu and J. Salvado, Geometric Compatibility of IceCube TeV-PeV Neutrino Excess and its Galactic Dark Matter Origin, JHEP 01 (2016) 161 [1311.5864].
  • [106] T. Higaki, R. Kitano and R. Sato, Neutrinoful Universe, JHEP 07 (2014) 044 [1405.0013].
  • [107] A. Esmaili, S.K. Kang and P.D. Serpico, IceCube events and decaying dark matter: hints and constraints, JCAP 12 (2014) 054 [1410.5979].
  • [108] K. Murase, R. Laha, S. Ando and M. Ahlers, Testing the Dark Matter Scenario for PeV Neutrinos Observed in IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071301 [1503.04663].
  • [109] E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive, Gravitino decay in high scale supersymmetry with R -parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 015030 [1805.07342].
  • [110] T. Cohen, K. Murase, N.L. Rodd, B.R. Safdi and Y. Soreq, γ -ray Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter and Implications for IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 021102 [1612.05638].
  • [111] C. Rott, K. Kohri and S.C. Park, Superheavy dark matter and IceCube neutrino signals: Bounds on decaying dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 023529 [1408.4575].
  • [112] C.A. Argüelles, D. Delgado, A. Friedlander, A. Kheirandish, I. Safa, A.C. Vincent et al., Dark Matter decay to neutrinos, 2210.01303.
  • [113] M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B174 (1986) 45.
  • [114] W. Abdallah, D. Delepine and S. Khalil, TeV Scale Leptogenesis in B-L Model with Alternative Cosmologies, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 361 [1205.1503].
  • [115] B. Dutta, C.S. Fong, E. Jimenez and E. Nardi, A cosmological pathway to testable leptogenesis, JCAP 10 (2018) 025 [1804.07676].
  • [116] D. Mahanta and D. Borah, TeV Scale Leptogenesis with Dark Matter in Non-standard Cosmology, JCAP 04 (2020) 032 [1912.09726].
  • [117] S.-L. Chen, A. Dutta Banik and Z.-K. Liu, Leptogenesis in fast expanding Universe, JCAP 03 (2020) 009 [1912.07185].
  • [118] A. Di Marco, A.D. Banik, A. Ghoshal and G. Pradisi, Minimal leptogenesis in brane-inspired cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 103509 [2211.11361].