Cosmic string bursts in LISA

Author(s)

Auclair, Pierre, Babak, Stanislav, Quelquejay Leclere, Hippolyte, Steer, Danièle A.

Abstract

Cosmic string cusps are sources of short-lived, linearly polarized gravitational wave bursts which can be searched for in gravitational wave detectors. We assess the capability of LISA to detect these bursts using the latest LISA configuration and operational assumptions. For such short bursts, we verify that LISA can be considered as “frozen”, namely that one can neglect LISA’s orbital motion. We consider two models for the network of cosmic string loops, and estimate that LISA should be able to detect 4–30 bursts per year assuming a string tension <math display="inline"><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>μ</mi><mo>≈</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>10.6</mn></mrow></msup><mi>–</mi><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>10.1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math> and detection threshold <math display="inline"><mi>SNR</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>20</mn></math>. Nondetection of these bursts would constrain the string tension to <math display="inline"><mi>G</mi><mi>μ</mi><mo>≲</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>11</mn></mrow></msup></math> for both models.

Figures

Schematic view of a cosmic string burst, with the beaming angle $\beam$ in red and the misalignement angle $\beta$.
Caption Schematic view of a cosmic string burst, with the beaming angle $\beam$ in red and the misalignement angle $\beta$.
Cusp strain in time domain computed using \cref{eq:cusp-time}, and fixing (see Section \ref{sec:snr}) $\flow=f_1 = 0.1$mHz, $\fhigh=f_2=50$mHz, characteristic of LISA.
Caption Cusp strain in time domain computed using \cref{eq:cusp-time}, and fixing (see Section \ref{sec:snr}) $\flow=f_1 = 0.1$mHz, $\fhigh=f_2=50$mHz, characteristic of LISA.
Left panel: Detection efficiency of LISA for a burst of amplitude $A=10^{-21} \mathrm{s}^{-1/3}$ marginalized over the sky-localization of the source and polarization angle. Right panel: Probability that a burst with amplitude $A$ has SNR larger than $\snrcut = 20$.
Caption Left panel: Detection efficiency of LISA for a burst of amplitude $A=10^{-21} \mathrm{s}^{-1/3}$ marginalized over the sky-localization of the source and polarization angle. Right panel: Probability that a burst with amplitude $A$ has SNR larger than $\snrcut = 20$.
Left panel: Detection efficiency of LISA for a burst of amplitude $A=10^{-21} \mathrm{s}^{-1/3}$ marginalized over the sky-localization of the source and polarization angle. Right panel: Probability that a burst with amplitude $A$ has SNR larger than $\snrcut = 20$.
Caption Left panel: Detection efficiency of LISA for a burst of amplitude $A=10^{-21} \mathrm{s}^{-1/3}$ marginalized over the sky-localization of the source and polarization angle. Right panel: Probability that a burst with amplitude $A$ has SNR larger than $\snrcut = 20$.
Expected rate of detected bursts in LISA as a function of the string tension for models BOS and LRS. In case LISA does not detect bursts from cosmic string cusps, the orange hatched region is excluded after $\Tobs = 82 \% \times 4.5$ years and the blue hatched region is excluded after $\Tobs=82 \% \times 10$ years.
Caption Expected rate of detected bursts in LISA as a function of the string tension for models BOS and LRS. In case LISA does not detect bursts from cosmic string cusps, the orange hatched region is excluded after $\Tobs = 82 \% \times 4.5$ years and the blue hatched region is excluded after $\Tobs=82 \% \times 10$ years.
References
  • 1LISA Science Study Team, Technical Report, 2018, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/678316/1700384/SciRD.pdf/25831f6b-3c01-e215-5916-4ac6e4b306fb?t=1526479841000.
  • 2T. Littenberg, K. Breivik, W. R. Brown, M. Eracleous, J. J. Hermes, K. Holley-Bockelmann, K. Kremer, T. Kupfer, and S. L. Larson, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 34 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 3R. Caldwell, M. Amin, C. Hogan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. Holz, P. Jetzer, E. Kovitz, P. Natarajan, D. Shoemaker, T. Smith , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 67 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 4M. Colpi, K. Holley-Bockelmann, T. Bogdanović, P. Natarajan, J. Bellovary, A. Sesana, M. Tremmel, J. Schnittman, J. Comerford, E. Barausse , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 432 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 5C. Cutler, E. Berti, K. Holley-Bockelmann, K. Jani, E. D. Kovetz, S. L. Larson, T. Littenberg, S. T. McWilliams, G. Mueller, L. Randall , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 109 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 6J. Baker, Z. Haiman, E. M. Rossi, E. Berger, N. Brandt, E. Breedt, K. Breivik, M. Charisi, A. Derdzinski, D. J. D’Orazio , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 123 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 7P. Natarajan, A. Ricarte, V. Baldassare, J. Bellovary, P. Bender, E. Berti, N. Cappelluti, A. Ferrara, J. Greene, Z. Haiman , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 73 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 8C. Berry, S. Hughes, C. Sopuerta, A. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. Mihaylov, C. Miller, and A. Sesana, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 42 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 9N. Cornish, E. Berti, K. Holley-Bockelmann, S. Larson, S. McWilliams, G. Mueller, P. Natarajan, and M. Vallisneri, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 76 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 10S. T. McWilliams, R. Caldwell, K. Holley-Bockelmann, S. L. Larson, and M. Vallisneri, arXiv:1903.04592.
  • 11E. Berti, E. Barausse, I. Cholis, J. Garcia-Bellido, K. Holley-Bockelmann, S. A. Hughes, B. Kelly, E. D. Kovetz, T. B. Littenberg, J. Livas , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 32 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 12J. Bellovary, A. Brooks, M. Colpi, M. Eracleous, K. Holley-Bockelmann, A. Hornschemeier, L. Mayer, P. Natarajan, J. Slutsky, and M. Tremmel, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 175 (2019).AASBAR0002-7537
  • 13T. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).JPHAC50305-447010.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029
  • 14M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995).RPPHAG0034-488510.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001
  • 15A. Vilenkin and E. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000), ISBN: 978-0-521-65476-0.
  • 16T. Vachaspati, L. Pogosian, and D. Steer, Scholarpedia 10, 31682 (2015).1941-601610.4249/scholarpedia.31682
  • 17P. Auclair , J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 034.JCAPBP1475-751610.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/034
  • 18T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3761 (2000).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3761
  • 19T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064008 (2001).PRVDAQ0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.64.064008
  • 20B. P. Abbott (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 97, 102002 (2018).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.97.102002
  • 21R. Abbott (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 241102 (2021).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.126.241102
  • 22S. Babak , Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 184026 (2008).CQGRDG0264-938110.1088/0264-9381/25/18/184026
  • 23M. I. Cohen, C. Cutler, and M. Vallisneri, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 185012 (2010).CQGRDG0264-938110.1088/0264-9381/27/18/185012
  • 24J. Shapiro Key and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 79, 043014 (2009).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.79.043014
  • 25S. Babak (Mock LISA Data Challenge Task Force Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084009 (2010).CQGRDG0264-938110.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084009
  • 26Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, and D. E. Morrissey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 211302 (2020).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.125.211302
  • 27C. Ringeval, Adv. Astron. 2010, 380507 (2010).1687-796910.1155/2010/380507
  • 28P. A. R. Ade (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 571, A25 (2014).AAEJAF0004-636110.1051/0004-6361/201321621
  • 29J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023512 (2014).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.89.023512
  • 30L. Lorenz, C. Ringeval, and M. Sakellariadou, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2010) 003.JCAPBP1475-751610.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/003
  • 31J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and X. Siemens, Phys. Lett. B 778, 392 (2018).PYLBAJ0370-269310.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.050
  • 32C. Ringeval and T. Suyama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2017) 027.JCAPBP1475-751610.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/027
  • 33J. Ellis and M. Lewicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041304 (2021).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041304
  • 34S. Blasi, V. Brdar, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041305 (2021).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041305
  • 35L. Bian, J. Shu, B. Wang, Q. Yuan, and J. Zong, Phys. Rev. D 106, L101301 (2022).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.106.L101301
  • 36Z.-C. Chen, Y.-M. Wu, and Q.-G. Huang, Astrophys. J. 936, 20 (2022).ASJOAB0004-637X10.3847/1538-4357/ac86cb
  • 37P. Binetruy, A. Bohe, T. Hertog, and D. A. Steer, Phys. Rev. D 80, 123510 (2009).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.80.123510
  • 38X. Siemens, J. Creighton, I. Maor, S. Ray Majumder, K. Cannon, and J. Read, Phys. Rev. D 73, 105001 (2006).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.73.105001
  • 39M. Tinto and S. V. Dhurandhar, Living Rev. Relativity 24, 1 (2021).1433-835110.1007/s41114-020-00029-6
  • 40S. Babak, A. Petiteau, and M. Hewitson, arXiv:2108.01167.
  • 41J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104046 (2017).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.104046
  • 42C. Ringeval, M. Sakellariadou, and F. Bouchet, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2007) 023.JCAPBP1475-751610.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/023
  • 43P. Auclair (LISA Cosmology Working Group), arXiv:2204.05434.
  • 44H. Q. Leclere (EPTA Collaboration), arXiv:2306.12234.
  • 45K. Kuijken, X. Siemens, and T. Vachaspati, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384, 161 (2008).MNRAA40035-871110.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12663.x
  • 46J. K. Bloomfield and D. F. Chernoff, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124003 (2014).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.89.124003
  • 47K. Jones-Smith, H. Mathur, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 81, 043503 (2010).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.81.043503
  • 48D. A. Steer and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 83, 043528 (2011).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.83.043528
  • 49T. Robson and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 99, 024019 (2019).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.99.024019
  • 50J.-B. Bayle, Theses, Université de Paris; Université Paris Diderot; Laboratoire Astroparticules et Cosmologie, 2019, https://hal.science/tel-03120731.