Repeated gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings

Author(s)

Auclair, Pierre, Steer, Danièle A., Vachaspati, Tanmay

Abstract

A characteristic observational signature of cosmic strings are short duration gravitational wave (GW) bursts. These have been searched for by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) Collaboration and will be searched for with LISA. We point out that these burst signals are repeated, since cosmic string loops evolve quasiperiodically in time, and will always appear from essentially the same position in the sky. We estimate the number of GW repeaters for LVK and LISA and show that the string tension that can be probed scales as detector sensitivity to the sixth power, which raises hope for detection in future GW detectors. The observation of repeated GW bursts from the same cosmic string loop helps distinguish between the GW waveform parameters and the sky localization.

Figures

Number of repeaters per logarithmic bin of the period, $T=\ell/2$, as seen by different GW detectors for $G\mu=10^{-10}$. The solid line shows \cref{eq:rate-nogain}, ignoring repetitions. The dashed line shows \cref{eq:rate-gain}, namely including the sensitivity gain due to repetition. If not all repeaters are observed, one would expect a rate somewhere in the shaded regions. (Assuming $T_O = 4$ years for each detector.)
Caption Number of repeaters per logarithmic bin of the period, $T=\ell/2$, as seen by different GW detectors for $G\mu=10^{-10}$. The solid line shows \cref{eq:rate-nogain}, ignoring repetitions. The dashed line shows \cref{eq:rate-gain}, namely including the sensitivity gain due to repetition. If not all repeaters are observed, one would expect a rate somewhere in the shaded regions. (Assuming $T_O = 4$ years for each detector.)
 :
Caption :
 :  : Modulation of the SNR in the reference frame of LISA for a repeating burst of amplitude $A = 10^{-21}$ in the equatorial plane (red) and at colatitude $\pi / 4$ (orange) and with same longitude. Left panel: antenna pattern of LISA in its own reference frame using Time Delay Interferometry (TDI) and generation 1.5 variables~ \cite{Tinto:2020fcc,Auclair:2023brk}. Right panel: evolution of the SNR over the course of one year.
Caption : : Modulation of the SNR in the reference frame of LISA for a repeating burst of amplitude $A = 10^{-21}$ in the equatorial plane (red) and at colatitude $\pi / 4$ (orange) and with same longitude. Left panel: antenna pattern of LISA in its own reference frame using Time Delay Interferometry (TDI) and generation 1.5 variables~ \cite{Tinto:2020fcc,Auclair:2023brk}. Right panel: evolution of the SNR over the course of one year.
References
  • 1A. Vilenkin and E. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000), ISBN: 978-0-521-65476-0.
  • 2T. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).JPHAC50305-447010.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029
  • 3M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995).RPPHAG0034-488510.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001
  • 4T. Vachaspati, L. Pogosian, and D. Steer, Scholarpedia 10, 31682 (2015).1941-601610.4249/scholarpedia.31682
  • 5C. Ringeval, Adv. Astron. 2010, 380507 (2010).1687-796910.1155/2010/380507
  • 6P. Auclair, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, D. G. Figueroa, A. C. Jenkins, M. Lewicki, M. Sakellariadou, S. Sanidas, L. Sousa, D. A. Steer, J. M. Wachter , J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 034.JCAPBP1475-751610.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/034
  • 7R. Abbott (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 241102 (2021).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.126.241102
  • 8J. Ellis and M. Lewicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041304 (2021).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041304
  • 9S. Blasi, V. Brdar, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041305 (2021).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041305
  • 10L. Bian, J. Shu, B. Wang, Q. Yuan, and J. Zong, Phys. Rev. D 106, L101301 (2022).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.106.L101301
  • 11Z.-C. Chen, Y.-M. Wu, and Q.-G. Huang, Astrophys. J. 936, 20 (2022).ASJOAB0004-637X10.3847/1538-4357/ac86cb
  • 12H. Quelquejay Leclere (The European Pulsar Timing Array Collaboration), arXiv:2306.12234.
  • 13T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3761 (2000).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3761
  • 14T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064008 (2001).PRVDAQ0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.64.064008
  • 15C. J. Copi, F. Ferrer, T. Vachaspati, and A. Achucarro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 171302 (2008).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.101.171302
  • 16J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, Phys. Rev. D 92, 063528 (2015).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.92.063528
  • 17B. P. Abbott (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 97, 102002 (2018).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.97.102002
  • 18F. Dubath and J. V. Rocha, Phys. Rev. D 76, 024001 (2007).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.76.024001
  • 19X. Siemens, J. Creighton, I. Maor, S. Ray Majumder, K. Cannon, and J. Read, Phys. Rev. D 73, 105001 (2006).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.73.105001
  • 20P. Auclair, S. Babak, H. Q. Leclere, and D. A. Steer, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043519 (2023).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.108.043519
  • 21J. Shapiro Key and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 79, 043014 (2009).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.79.043014
  • 22aJ. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D 59, 063508 (1999); PRVDAQ0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.59.06350822bJ. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. OlumPhys. Rev. D103, 029902(E) (2021).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.103.029902
  • 22aJ. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D 59, 063508 (1999); PRVDAQ0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.59.06350822bJ. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. OlumPhys. Rev. D103, 029902(E) (2021).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.103.029902
  • 23K. D. Olum and J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Phys. Rev. D 60, 023503 (1999).PRVDAQ0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.60.023503
  • 24R. Durrer, Nucl. Phys. B328, 238 (1989).NUPBBO0550-321310.1016/0550-3213(89)90103-X
  • 25J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023512 (2014).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.89.023512
  • 26V. Morello, E. D. Barr, B. W. Stappers, E. F. Keane, and A. G. Lyne, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497, 4654 (2020).MNRAA40035-871110.1093/mnras/staa2291
  • 27S. Babak , Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 184026 (2008).CQGRDG0264-938110.1088/0264-9381/25/18/184026
  • 28M. I. Cohen, C. Cutler, and M. Vallisneri, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 185012 (2010).CQGRDG0264-938110.1088/0264-9381/27/18/185012
  • 29S. Babak (Mock LISA Data Challenge Task Force Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084009 (2010).CQGRDG0264-938110.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084009
  • 30M. Tinto and S. V. Dhurandhar, Living Rev. Relativity 24, 1 (2021).1433-835110.1007/s41114-020-00029-6
  • 31J. Mei (TianQin Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A107 (2021), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article/2021/5/05A107/5880559.PTEPCR2050-3911
  • 32D. A. Steer and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 83, 043528 (2011).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.83.043528
  • 33T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 81, 043531 (2010).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.81.043531
  • 34T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 141301 (2008).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.101.141301
  • 35Y.-F. Cai, E. Sabancilar, D. A. Steer, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 86, 043521 (2012).PRVDAQ1550-799810.1103/PhysRevD.86.043521
  • 36D. Garfinkle and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2229 (1987).PRVDAQ0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.36.2229